-Diogenes Laertius, Life of Diogenes the Cynic
As the argument over imposing Western ideals upon the Middle East is waged, another related battle has resumed. Nearly a decade ago Martha Nussbaum wrote a seminal essay claiming that a cosmopolitan world-view should be fostered as opposed to one infused with patriotism. The role of a liberal education should strive for “the very old ideal of the cosmopolitan, the person whose primary allegiance is to the community of human beings in the entire world.”
Lee Harris has written a timely response to Nussbaum's essay. He feels that patriotism can inform and educate a populace while actually propeling it towards the cosmopolitan ideals that Nussbaum advocates.
"All imperial societies find it in their interest to promote the ideal of cosmopolitan values, by which they mean that of the dominant culture, in contradiction to the clearly inferior local values of those on the outskirts of the world".
Additionally, he feels that patriotism is more readily adept at handling the inherent conflicts that exist amongst peoples.
In fact, the whole attempt to frame the question as a choice between patriotism and cosmopolitanism turns out to be illusory, because it assumes that one may have an undivided allegiance to the community of all human beings on the planet, when in fact this is impossible as long as human beings are capable of dividing themselves into two conflicting camps — and it makes no difference what constitutes the source of the structural antagonism embodied in this conflict. Indeed, a cosmopolitanism that can clash with patriotism, such as Nussbaum envisions, is, for that very reason, no longer a genuine cosmopolitanism. It no longer speaks for those who remain loyal to their own country, and hence becomes a merely sectarian ideology — and hardly the universal and all-encompassing faith that it aspired to be.
What is the worldview that should be taken in these tumultuous times? Is it one that adheres to the notion that all humanity speaks with one voice and shares one dream? Can we advocate a universal system that fosters the betterment of man and acknowledges the inherent differences created by geography, tradition, and culture?